Menù dei Marcatori

Ipertesto Neoplasie

 

LINKS

 

 

   

  CD10

CD10

espressione nella patologia non ematologica

Numerose applicazioni di CD10 sono state descritte recentemente in diversi campi della Patologia non ematologica.
 
Am J Clin Pathol 2000 Mar;113(3):374-82 
Paraffin-section detection of CD10 in 505 nonhematopoietic neoplasms. Frequent expression in renal cell carcinoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma. 
 
Chu P, Arber DA. 
 
Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA. 
 
We tested 505 cases of nonhematopoietic neoplasms by immunohistochemistry using a newly characterized monoclonal antibody (clone 56C6) against the CD10 antigen. CD10 was expressed widely in neoplasms of the genitourinary tract, including 41 (89%) of 46 cases of renal cell carcinoma, 13 (54%) of 24 cases of transitional cell carcinoma, and 11 (61%) of 18 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma. In addition, 5 (100%) of 5 endometrial stromal sarcomas, 3 (60%) of 5 rhabdomyosarcomas, 7 (50%) of 14 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 5 (45%) of 11 cases of schwannoma, and 12 (40%) of 30 cases of malignant melanoma also were positive for CD10. Similar to normal tissue, CD10 positivity was restricted to the apical surface of malignant glandular cells of well-differentiated colonic, pancreatic, and prostatic adenocarcinoma, whereas in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and other tumors, such as melanoma, transitional cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and endometrial stromal sarcoma, the CD10 positivity showed diffuse cytoplasmic or membranous/Golgi patterns. The monoclonal antibody clone 56C6 is a reliable marker for CD10 in paraffin immunohistochemistry after heat-induced epitope retrieval. CD10 expression in renal cell carcinoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma may be a useful marker in the differential diagnoses of these tumors because both tumors otherwise lack specific markers.
 
 
Mod Pathol 2001 May;14(5):465-71
Utility of CD10 in Distinguishing between Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma and Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors: An Immunohistochemical Comparison of 34 Cases.

Chu PG, Arber DA, Weiss LM, Chang KL.

Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), uterine cellular leiomyoma (UCL), and uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULS) are composed mainly of spindle cells that express similar antigens such as desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), and muscle-specific actin (MSA). The differential diagnosis of an ESS versus a uterine smooth muscle tumor or an extrauterine spindle cell sarcoma can be problematic based solely on clinical presentation, histologic assessment, or routine immunohistochemistry. Recently, we reported that normal endometrium, but not myometrium, as well as five cases of ESS, were positive for CD10. We now report the results of CD10 immunohistochemistry in an additional 11 cases of ESS (total 16 cases), 10 cases of UCL, and nine cases of ULS. CD10 immunoreactivity was detected in 16 of 16 cases of ESS (100%) as compared to only 2 of 10 cases of UCL (20%) and none of nine cases of ULS (0%). We compared the utility of CD10 immunoreactivity with that of desmin, SMA, MSA, estrogen receptor (ER), and inhibin in these tumors. Although the majority of cases of UCL and ULS were positive for SMA, MSA, and desmin, a substantial portion of cases of ESS were also positive for SMA, MSA, and desmin. We conclude that in combination with SMA, MSA, and desmin, CD10 is a useful immunohistochemical marker in the differential diagnosis of ESS versus UCL or ULS.

 

Lab Invest 2000 Nov;80(11):1729-38
The expression and localization of neutral endopeptidase 24.11/CD10 in human gestational trophoblastic diseases.

Ino K, Suzuki T, Uehara C, Nagasaka T, Okamoto T, Kikkawa F, Mizutani S

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan. kazuino@tsuru.med.nagoya-u.ac.jp

Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP)/CD10 is a cell-surface peptidase that hydrolyzes various bioactive peptides. NEP is distributed in both normal and neoplastic cells and plays a functional role by modulating cellular responses to peptide substrates. Recently, NEP has been shown to be expressed in normal placental trophoblasts, suggesting its physiological role during pregnancy. In the present study, we investigated the expression of NEP in hyperplastic and anaplastic trophoblasts in gestational trophoblastic diseases (GTDs). Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that NEP was expressed in all choriocarcinoma cell lines examined. The NEP enzyme activity in these cell lines correlated with cell-surface protein levels and was abolished by the NEP inhibitor phosphoramidon. On immunoblot analysis, NEP protein was detected in both hydatidiform mole and choriocarcinoma tissues as a double band of 95 and 100 kDa similar to that of the normal placental tissues. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that NEP was present on syncytiotrophoblasts, while no or very faint NEP immunoreactivity was observed on cytotrophoblasts in the normal placenta. Similarly, NEP in hydatidiform mole and invasive mole was localized on the membrane of syncytiotrophoblasts, but not on hyperplastic cytotrophoblasts. In contrast, in choriocarcinoma, NEP was highly expressed not only on syncytiotrophoblastic cells but also on invading anaplastic cytotrophoblasts. In addition, NEP was also expressed on intermediate trophoblasts in placental site trophoblastic tumors. In summary, this is the first study demonstrating the expression of NEP/CD10 in GTDs. The differential localization of NEP among various trophoblastic tumors suggests that NEP may play a functional role in the regulation of trophoblast transformation and human chorionic gonadotropin secretion.

 

Am J Surg Pathol 2000 Feb;24(2):203-10 

Use of antibodies to RCC and CD10 in the differential diagnosis of renal neoplasms. 

 

Avery AK, Beckstead J, Renshaw AA, Corless CL. 

 

Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201, USA. 

The majority of renal neoplasms can be distinguished on the basis of histologic examination alone; however, there are morphologic similarities between clear cell renal carcinoma and chromophobe cell carcinoma, as well as between the granular/eosinophilic variants of these tumors and renal oncocytoma. Only a limited number of histochemical markers are available to aid in the differential diagnosis of these neoplasms. Hale's colloidal iron usually yields strong, diffuse cytoplasmic staining of chromophobe cell carcinomas whereas clear cell carcinomas are generally negative; however, interpretation of this stain is not always straightforward. By immunohistochemistry, vimentin is detectable in most clear cell carcinomas and is absent from most chromophobe cell tumors and oncocytomas, but reliance on a single antibody can be misleading. In this report we examine the use of commercially available monoclonal antibodies to RCC and CD10 in the differential diagnosis of common renal tumors. Eighty-five percent of clear cell carcinomas (53 of 62) had detectable surface membrane staining for RCC, and 94% (58 of 62) were positive for CD10. Papillary carcinomas were likewise strongly positive for RCC and CD10 in nearly all cases (13 of 14 each). In contrast, all 19 chromophobe cell carcinomas examined were completely negative for surface membrane staining with both of these markers. Oncocytomas were also negative for RCC (0 of 9), but CD10 was detectable in some cases (3 of 9). These results suggest that the presence of surface membrane staining for RCC and CD10 may be used to confirm a diagnosis of suspected clear cell or papillary renal carcinoma. Chromophobe cell carcinomas should be negative for both markers. The absence of RCC staining may also be helpful in the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.

 

 

Am J Surg Pathol 2000 Oct;24(10):1361-71

Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: immunohistochemical localization of neuroendocrine markers and CD10.

Notohara K, Hamazaki S, Tsukayama C, Nakamoto S, Kawabata K, Mizobuchi K, Sakamoto K, Okada S

Department of Pathology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. notohara@med.okayama-u.ac.jp

To clarify the neuroendocrine differentiation and CD10 expression in solid-pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas, we performed immunohistochemical analysis in 19 such tumors, including one solid-pseudopapillary carcinoma (SPC), along with 20 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNTs), six acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs), and one pancreatoblastoma (PB). We used antisera directed against CD56, synaptophysin, protein gene product 9.5, the alpha-subunit of Go protein, chromogranin A, CD10, trypsin, chymotrypsin, various cytokeratins (CKs), CA19-9, vimentin, and alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT). All SPTs exhibited immunoreactivity for CD56 and CD10, and 15 expressed other neuroendocrine markers focally with the exception of chromogranin A. Frequent clustering of synaptophysin-positive cells was noted. Two cases contained a peculiar nodule that cytomorphologically and immunohistochemically resembled PNT. CD10-positive cells were scarce in one SPC. PNTs were CD56-positive, but often with faint intensity, and staining for other neuroendocrine markers, including chromogranin A, was diffusely positive. CD10 was detected, mostly in a focal pattern, in five PNTs. Pan-CK, CK8, CK18, and CK19 were more frequently demonstrated in PNT than SPT. Vimentin and AAT were often identified in PNT as well and were not specific for SPT. ACCs were CD56-negative, with the exception of one case designated as a mixed acinar-endocrine carcinoma. PB was focally positive for CD56 at the periphery of the tumor nests. Four ACCs and one PB exhibited focal CD10 reactivity. This study demonstrated the unique immunohistochemical features of SPT. Our results also suggest that SPT exhibits, at least focally, neuroendocrine differentiation, and that these neuroendocrine markers and CD10 are diagnostically useful.