|
LINKS
| |
CD10
CD10
espressione nella
patologia non ematologica
- Numerose applicazioni di CD10 sono
state descritte recentemente in diversi campi della Patologia non
ematologica.
-
-
- Am J Clin Pathol 2000 Mar;113(3):374-82
- Paraffin-section detection of CD10 in 505
nonhematopoietic neoplasms. Frequent expression in renal cell carcinoma
and endometrial stromal sarcoma.
-
- Chu P, Arber DA.
-
- Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical
Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
-
- We tested 505 cases of nonhematopoietic neoplasms by
immunohistochemistry using a newly characterized monoclonal antibody
(clone 56C6) against the CD10 antigen. CD10 was expressed widely in
neoplasms of the genitourinary tract, including 41 (89%) of 46 cases of
renal cell carcinoma, 13 (54%) of 24 cases of transitional cell carcinoma,
and 11 (61%) of 18 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma. In addition, 5
(100%) of 5 endometrial stromal sarcomas, 3 (60%) of 5 rhabdomyosarcomas,
7 (50%) of 14 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 5 (45%) of 11 cases of
schwannoma, and 12 (40%) of 30 cases of malignant melanoma also were
positive for CD10. Similar to normal tissue, CD10 positivity was
restricted to the apical surface of malignant glandular cells of
well-differentiated colonic, pancreatic, and prostatic adenocarcinoma,
whereas in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and other tumors, such as
melanoma, transitional cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and
endometrial stromal sarcoma, the CD10 positivity showed diffuse
cytoplasmic or membranous/Golgi patterns. The monoclonal antibody clone
56C6 is a reliable marker for CD10 in paraffin immunohistochemistry after
heat-induced epitope retrieval. CD10 expression in renal cell carcinoma
and endometrial stromal sarcoma may be a useful marker in the differential
diagnoses of these tumors because both tumors otherwise lack specific
markers.
-
-
- Mod Pathol 2001 May;14(5):465-71
Utility of CD10 in Distinguishing between Endometrial
Stromal Sarcoma and Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors: An Immunohistochemical
Comparison of 34 Cases.
Chu PG, Arber DA, Weiss LM, Chang KL.
Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte,
California.
Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), uterine cellular leiomyoma (UCL), and
uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULS) are composed mainly of spindle cells that
express similar antigens such as desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), and
muscle-specific actin (MSA). The differential diagnosis of an ESS versus a
uterine smooth muscle tumor or an extrauterine spindle cell sarcoma can be
problematic based solely on clinical presentation, histologic assessment,
or routine immunohistochemistry. Recently, we reported that normal
endometrium, but not myometrium, as well as five cases of ESS, were
positive for CD10. We now report the results of CD10 immunohistochemistry
in an additional 11 cases of ESS (total 16 cases), 10 cases of UCL, and
nine cases of ULS. CD10 immunoreactivity was detected in 16 of 16 cases of
ESS (100%) as compared to only 2 of 10 cases of UCL (20%) and none of nine
cases of ULS (0%). We compared the utility of CD10 immunoreactivity with
that of desmin, SMA, MSA, estrogen receptor (ER), and inhibin in these
tumors. Although the majority of cases of UCL and ULS were positive for
SMA, MSA, and desmin, a substantial portion of cases of ESS were also
positive for SMA, MSA, and desmin. We conclude that in combination with
SMA, MSA, and desmin, CD10 is a useful immunohistochemical marker in the
differential diagnosis of ESS versus UCL or ULS.
-
Lab Invest 2000 Nov;80(11):1729-38
- The expression and localization of neutral
endopeptidase 24.11/CD10 in human gestational trophoblastic diseases.
Ino K, Suzuki T, Uehara C, Nagasaka T, Okamoto T, Kikkawa F, Mizutani S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University School of
Medicine, Japan. kazuino@tsuru.med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP)/CD10 is a cell-surface peptidase that
hydrolyzes various bioactive peptides. NEP is distributed in both normal and
neoplastic cells and plays a functional role by modulating cellular
responses to peptide substrates. Recently, NEP has been shown to be
expressed in normal placental trophoblasts, suggesting its physiological
role during pregnancy. In the present study, we investigated the expression
of NEP in hyperplastic and anaplastic trophoblasts in gestational
trophoblastic diseases (GTDs). Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that
NEP was expressed in all choriocarcinoma cell lines examined. The NEP enzyme
activity in these cell lines correlated with cell-surface protein levels and
was abolished by the NEP inhibitor phosphoramidon. On immunoblot analysis,
NEP protein was detected in both hydatidiform mole and choriocarcinoma
tissues as a double band of 95 and 100 kDa similar to that of the normal
placental tissues. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that NEP was
present on syncytiotrophoblasts, while no or very faint NEP immunoreactivity
was observed on cytotrophoblasts in the normal placenta. Similarly, NEP in
hydatidiform mole and invasive mole was localized on the membrane of
syncytiotrophoblasts, but not on hyperplastic cytotrophoblasts. In contrast,
in choriocarcinoma, NEP was highly expressed not only on
syncytiotrophoblastic cells but also on invading anaplastic cytotrophoblasts.
In addition, NEP was also expressed on intermediate trophoblasts in
placental site trophoblastic tumors. In summary, this is the first study
demonstrating the expression of NEP/CD10 in GTDs. The differential
localization of NEP among various trophoblastic tumors suggests that NEP may
play a functional role in the regulation of trophoblast transformation and
human chorionic gonadotropin secretion.
Am J Surg
Pathol 2000 Feb;24(2):203-10
Use of
antibodies to RCC and CD10 in the differential diagnosis of renal neoplasms.
Avery AK,
Beckstead J, Renshaw AA, Corless CL.
Department of
Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University,
Portland 97201, USA.
The majority
of renal neoplasms can be distinguished on the basis of histologic
examination alone; however, there are morphologic similarities between clear
cell renal carcinoma and chromophobe cell carcinoma, as well as between the
granular/eosinophilic variants of these tumors and renal oncocytoma. Only a
limited number of histochemical markers are available to aid in the
differential diagnosis of these neoplasms. Hale's colloidal iron usually
yields strong, diffuse cytoplasmic staining of chromophobe cell carcinomas
whereas clear cell carcinomas are generally negative; however,
interpretation of this stain is not always straightforward. By
immunohistochemistry, vimentin is detectable in most clear cell carcinomas
and is absent from most chromophobe cell tumors and oncocytomas, but
reliance on a single antibody can be misleading. In this report we examine
the use of commercially available monoclonal antibodies to RCC and CD10 in
the differential diagnosis of common renal tumors. Eighty-five percent of
clear cell carcinomas (53 of 62) had detectable surface membrane staining
for RCC, and 94% (58 of 62) were positive for CD10. Papillary carcinomas
were likewise strongly positive for RCC and CD10 in nearly all cases (13 of
14 each). In contrast, all 19 chromophobe cell carcinomas examined were
completely negative for surface membrane staining with both of these markers.
Oncocytomas were also negative for RCC (0 of 9), but CD10 was detectable in
some cases (3 of 9). These results suggest that the presence of surface
membrane staining for RCC and CD10 may be used to confirm a diagnosis of
suspected clear cell or papillary renal carcinoma. Chromophobe cell
carcinomas should be negative for both markers. The absence of RCC staining
may also be helpful in the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.
Am J Surg Pathol 2000
Oct;24(10):1361-71
Solid-pseudopapillary
tumor of the pancreas: immunohistochemical localization of neuroendocrine
markers and CD10.
Notohara K, Hamazaki S, Tsukayama C, Nakamoto S, Kawabata K, Mizobuchi K,
Sakamoto K, Okada S
Department of Pathology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. notohara@med.okayama-u.ac.jp
To clarify the neuroendocrine differentiation and CD10 expression in
solid-pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas, we performed
immunohistochemical analysis in 19 such tumors, including one
solid-pseudopapillary carcinoma (SPC), along with 20 pancreatic
neuroendocrine tumors (PNTs), six acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs), and one
pancreatoblastoma (PB). We used antisera directed against CD56,
synaptophysin, protein gene product 9.5, the alpha-subunit of Go protein,
chromogranin A, CD10, trypsin, chymotrypsin, various cytokeratins (CKs),
CA19-9, vimentin, and alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT). All SPTs exhibited
immunoreactivity for CD56 and CD10, and 15 expressed other neuroendocrine
markers focally with the exception of chromogranin A. Frequent clustering of
synaptophysin-positive cells was noted. Two cases contained a peculiar
nodule that cytomorphologically and immunohistochemically resembled PNT.
CD10-positive cells were scarce in one SPC. PNTs were CD56-positive, but
often with faint intensity, and staining for other neuroendocrine markers,
including chromogranin A, was diffusely positive. CD10 was detected, mostly
in a focal pattern, in five PNTs. Pan-CK, CK8, CK18, and CK19 were more
frequently demonstrated in PNT than SPT. Vimentin and AAT were often
identified in PNT as well and were not specific for SPT. ACCs were
CD56-negative, with the exception of one case designated as a mixed
acinar-endocrine carcinoma. PB was focally positive for CD56 at the
periphery of the tumor nests. Four ACCs and one PB exhibited focal CD10
reactivity. This study demonstrated the unique immunohistochemical features
of SPT. Our results also suggest that SPT exhibits, at least focally,
neuroendocrine differentiation, and that these neuroendocrine markers and
CD10 are diagnostically useful.
|